Text 28808193 (71 lines) From: Hanuman (das) SDHS (Zagreb - HR) Date: 23.05.16 07:50 +0200 To: Prahladananda Swami  (received: 23.05.16 07:51 +0200) Cc: Badrinarayan Swami (San Diego - US) , Bhakti Raghava Swami , Bhakti-bhusana Swami , Gopal Krsna Goswami , Jayadvaita Swami , Kadamba Kanana Swami , Kavicandra Swami (GBC Japan)  (received: 23.05.16 07:53 +0200), Lokanath Swami , Sacinandana Swami , Virabahu (das) ACBSP (GBC) , firstname.lastname@example.org (sent: 23.05.16 07:52 +0200), email@example.com (sent: 23.05.16 07:52 +0200) Subject: 7th open letter - preventing the catastrophe ------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Prahladananda Swami,
please accept my humble obeisances.
All glories to Srila Prabhupada.
(For previous open letters and other info, go to: http://lastingimpression.info/ramesh_sacinandana/ )
In my previous 6 open letters, I asked Sacinanandana Swami repeatedly if he is living with his girlfriend Bhanu Nandini or not.
I didn’t receive reply to any of those letters.
Devotees from Berlin and around the world who wish to remain anonymous gave me testimonies that Sacinandana Swami is living together with his girlfriend Bhanu Nandini for last 5-6 years. There is also an anonymous article on the internet with many photos:
Additionally, I want to point out never in ISKCON history we had a sannyasi living with his girlfriend for 5 years. This is big disgrace for Srila Prabhupada and his movement.
We already communicated separately, and you claimed that you can’t start the investigation because nobody provided you with “first hand evidence”. I am also aware that GBC already made decision that Sacinandana Swami is not allowed to live with Bhanu Nandini.
Now regarding “first hand evidence”, devotees who provided evidence are known to me, and they are all living amongst Sacinandana Swami disciples. They will not go public, because they are afraid of retaliation. I am the only one who dares to speak publicly and because of that I was already banned from coming to local Zagreb temple by Sacinandana Swami’s disciples, Isvara Puri das and Govinda-nanda das, who are also followers of Ramesh baba. When I complained about that ban, you didn’t do anything about it, rather you told me that I should stop “purifying Srila Prabhupada’s disciples.”
You see the problem? From one hand, you want “first hand evidence”, from other hand you allow people who have evidence to be banned from ISKCON temples.
I think we are unique movement in the sense when someone exposes big deviation, he gets punished, instead of people who have done the wrong thing. ISKCON was using similar strategy in child abuse cases. And this backfired tremedeously. Let’s not repeat the history.
So, as you claim that you need “first hand evidence”, Srila Prabhupada’s disciple suggested to me to engage private investigators from Berlin to provide you with “first class evidence”.
This is last chance for you to start the investigation, if I engage private investigators and spend thousands of Euros on that, then I no longer need you, and I will publish all their photos publicly. And that will be the end of era Sacinandana Swami and beggining of era of Sacinandanana prabhu.
After Sacinananda prabhu goes down, next question will be why was he allowed to live with his girlfriend for 5-6 years, who is responsible for that? Guess where that investigation will end?
As we already agreed, doing things publicly is last resort, so please, solve this internally, or otherwise, I will resolve this in most ugly way possible.
Dignity of Prabhupada’s movement must be preserved by all means.
your servant, Hanuman das
This article originally appeared on Lasting Impression website